Christianity as practiced is not the teachings of Jesus — it’s the psychology of humans who cannot handle universality. See the Christ in another, or you have not truly seen Christ at all.
The claim that “Christianity as practiced is not the teachings of Jesus — it is the psychology of humans who cannot handle universality” is not a provocation; it is a precise diagnosis of a two‑thousand‑year tension between text and temperament, revelation and ego, metaphysics and tribal instinct. Any serious intellectual treatment of Christianity must begin with this fracture, because without it the entire tradition becomes unintelligible. The fracture is simple: the New Testament gestures toward a universal indwelling of the divine, while Christian history demonstrates an almost pathological inability to tolerate what universal indwelling implies. The result is a religion whose scriptures point toward interiority, equality, and radical mutual recognition, but whose institutions repeatedly collapse into hierarchy, exclusion, and violence. The tension begins with the metaphysical claim itself. Whether one interprets “the kingdom of God is within you” as metaphor or ontology, whether ...