Life's Tenacity: Thriving in the Harshest Climates

  I know ChatGPT, and I also know the standard criticism of systems like GPT: when it cannot find a satisfactory answer, it will reinterpret the question, flatten its complexity, or answer a different question altogether simply because it needs to produce an answer.  I have experienced that myself on so many occasions that I don't debate the validity of my position. So I want to be very clear about what I am actually asking and arguing here. My question is this: How has the West, after centuries of environmental destruction, colonialism, exploitation, and enormous consumption of the planet's resources, suddenly positioned itself as a guardian of Earth and humanity at precisely the moment when artificial intelligence has begun to raise the possibility of threatening its own technological, economic, and geopolitical dominance? When I refer to "the destroyer of the planet," I am speaking principally about the modern Western economic and political order—not about every in...

They were not pale Europeans. This is not controversial among historians or anthropologists. The ancient Israelites belonged to the Levant — a corridor where Africa, Arabia, and the Mediterranean meet. Their bodies carried the climate: sun‑hardened, brown‑toned, desert‑weathered. I'm not making a radical claim; it is the consensus of anthropology, genetics, and archaeology. Yet European religious imagination violently overwrote this reality, repainting the Levant with northern skin tones that never existed in the biblical world. The result is a centuries‑long visual hallucination: pale prophets, pale kings, pale messiahs — a complete inversion of the region’s human geography. Once you restore the Levantine body to the text, the contradictions in European biblical imagery become impossible to ignore. The biblical cases themselves assume this body. They assume a population whose skin can darken under famine, crack under heat, and contrast sharply with “white as snow” miracles.  Moses...

I’m going to finally allow myself to write this article, or post an article i've been bored to write for a while, bored because it's so mediocre level, it's like i'm being forced to devolve, with this one, i'm  mainly focusing on racist people who draw all sorts of symbols and tattoos on their bodies whilst professing to some spirituality or ideology which they believe will grant them automatic entry into some sort of afterlife paradise, exclusive only to white people—and it is called Valhalla, or whatever. This bothers me, seriously. Not for the political or racial edge of it alone, but for the logical edge. Initially, we can go into the spiritual edge and whatever and dissect things and prove, beyond reasonable doubt, the fallacy and the childlike position of theirs. I’m not going to do that. I want to look at it simply from a logical perspective. Now, why it bothers me is that you find some of the most powerful people on Earth, currently, today, as of 2026—some o...

Lauren Boebert's controversy is revealing—not because bisexuality or heterosexuality is politically scandalous, but because of the enormous gap that can exist between public moral performance and private conduct . Boebert publicly presents herself as a defender of “family values” and explicitly opposes redefining marriage beyond the union of a man and a woman. She has also made statements criticizing LGBTQ-related issues. Now, in September 2026, a sworn ethics complaint has alleged that she had sexual relationships with multiple members of her congressional staff, including a female staffer. Those allegations have not been independently established . Boebert has categorically denied them, and the staffer at the center of the principal allegation has also denied them. The point is not that being bisexual would make someone hypocritical. It wouldn't. Nor does an allegation become a fact merely because it fits a tale people already believe. The serious issue is what happens when a...

  A Spot in the House? Office ? Studio ? Health Center ? ETC. Using sound to discover spots in an area, or in an environment, or a house, building, whatever. This is something I discovered by accident a while back. Most of my... I wouldn't call them discoveries, because I'm sure that, in the hands of more qualified people, they'd be able to use this data better. But what I found is that there's a particular spot in my environment which I've noticed over the years. And it's something I don't care who believes me. Over the years, I tend to notice similarities — or maybe I shouldn't use that word. I tend to notice the effect in my dream state, or spiritual state, or contact state. Recently, I was just touring the house, or touring my environment, with one of these Wi-Fi speakers, playing a song that I've just written. And I discovered that the acoustics tended to not only sound better, but feel — I emphasize feel — better at certain spots. I don't ...

From a simplistic perspective—probably an emotional one—if one is a person of colour or an Indigenous person, and an intelligent person at that, it can be very easy to look at academia from a Western vantage point and regard it as a kind of newcomer: Johnny-just-come, Johnny-come-lately, the baby of the family. One might look at Western academia and think that it is a baby that refuses to acknowledge, or is simply devoid of, any serious body of data that is globally holistic and not exclusively Greco-Roman in its pronunciation, sourcing, announcement, or validation; data that does not, in rudimentary terms, validate and overvalue Western peoples and the Western way of understanding the world. It is easy to look at it and think, yes, this is what this culture is, or this is what academia looks like from this particular perspective. Sometimes, one might even become emotional or annoyed when one possesses what one considers to be correct, genuine knowledge that does not necessarily have t...