" Biblical God Yahweh's Flawed Military Tactics and Possible Evidence of Xenophobic Genetic Experimentation Like Lab Animals on the 'Poor People' ๐ Hidden Within Religious Doctrine" .
When we think of the God of the Bible, especially in the Old Testament, the image of an all-powerful, all-knowing being comes to mind—a being capable of guiding the people with perfect wisdom, both in times of peace and war.
What if this isn't necessarily so if we check these ancient texts with a critical eye?
What if the God of Israel wasn't the flawless military strategist we've been led to believe, and what if his rules on marriage, tribal purity, and conquest suggest a much deeper, more unsettling agenda?
Biblical stories often highlight Yahweh’s miraculous interventions and his protection over his chosen people, but the Old Testament is also filled with instances where battles are lost, territories remain unconquered, and the Israelite's fall into despair—all under Yahweh's guidance.
Even more jaw dropping are his direct commands regarding the treatment of women, children, and entire tribes after conquest. These ancient laws and instructions seem to go beyond mere spiritual guidance, suggesting an interest in manipulating the genetic future of some people, while preventing intermarriage with others, this in modern times is xenophobic at best and perhaps racist at worst.
In the list below, checkout some of the Bible’s most controversial moments: times when Yahweh's leadership in warfare was called into question and when his laws on marriage, conquest, and bloodlines point to an agenda that goes way beyond spirituality—a potential form of divine genetic engineering.
Yahweh's Bad Military Decisions
1. Judges 1:19
The LORD was with Judah, and they took possession of the hill country, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain, because they had chariots of iron
[ ENEMIES HAD BETTER WEAPONS/ SUPERIOR WEAPONS, STEALTH TECHNOLOGY OF THAT AGE ].
Issue: Despite Yahweh being with them, the Israelites failed to conquer the plains because the enemy had superior technology (iron chariots). This suggests limitations in Yahweh's military strategy or power over technology.
2. Numbers 14:42-45
"Do not go up, for the LORD is not among you, lest you be struck down before your enemies." But they presumed to go up to the heights of the hill country... Then the Amalekites and the Canaanites... defeated them and pursued them.
Issue: The Israelites were decisively beaten because Yahweh's presence was not with them after they disobeyed earlier instructions. This portrays a leader who cannot effectively manage his people’s obedience or ensure their protection without direct intervention.
3. 1 Samuel 4:1-11
The Israelites fought the Philistines, but they were defeated. They thought bringing the Ark of the Covenant would ensure victory, but they lost, and the Ark was captured.
Issue: Despite bringing the Ark of the Covenant into battle (a symbol of Yahweh’s presence), Israel was defeated, and the Philistines captured the Ark. This defeat demonstrates misjudgment in relying on symbols rather than tactical advantage.
4. 2 Samuel 24:1-10 (Paralleled in 1 Chronicles 21:1-17)
Yahweh incited David to conduct a census, which led to military disaster.
Issue: Yahweh’s encouragement of a census led to divine punishment, and 70,000 people died as a result. This raises questions about the foresight and purpose of such a command, which led directly to loss of life.
5. Joshua 7:2-5 (Battle of Ai)
Israel sent a small force to attack Ai, expecting easy victory, but they were defeated.
Issue: Poor military strategy or divine punishment after Achan’s sin of taking spoils from Jericho caused the Israelites to be defeated by a much smaller force. Yahweh’s leadership led to embarrassment and retreat.
Yahweh’s Order's Suggesting Genetic Experimentation or Selective Breeding
1. Deuteronomy 7:3-4
“Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods."
Directive: This command emphasizes maintaining a certain genetic line within the chosen people, avoiding intermarriage with surrounding nations. The reasoning may be to preserve a distinct “chosen” lineage.
2. Numbers 31:17-18
“Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.”
Directive: After defeating the Midianites, Yahweh commands the killing of male children and non-virgin women, while sparing virgin girls for the Israelites. This implies selective breeding practices after warfare, where only young, virgin women are considered suitable for integration into the Israelite population.
3. Deuteronomy 23:2-3
“No one born of a forbidden marriage nor any of their descendants may enter the assembly of the Lord, not even in the tenth generation.”
Directive: A strict ban on those born of certain unions (e.g., with foreigners, illegitimate children) from entering the congregation shows a form of genetic exclusion, reinforcing the idea of maintaining a particular lineage.
4. Leviticus 18:6-23 (Laws of Forbidden Relations)
Prohibitions against incest, bestiality, and relations with certain family members.
Directive: Yahweh outlines very specific laws governing sexual relations, which can be seen as a way to control genetic outcomes and maintain the health or tagline of the bloodline.
5. Deuteronomy 20:13-14
When Yahweh commands Israel to besiege a town, they are to kill all men but take the women and children as spoils.
Directive: This suggests a policy of taking women as concubines or wives after battle, further indicating selective breeding after military conquest. Men are killed, but women are integrated into Israelite society, potentially affecting the gene pool.
6. Ezra 9:1-2
“The people of Israel... have not kept themselves separate from the neighboring peoples with their detestable practices... They have taken some of their daughters as wives... and the holy race has become mingled with the peoples around them.”
Directive: This points to the "holy race" concept, implying that mixing with non-Israelites was viewed as diluting the sanctity of their genetic lineage. Yahweh’s concern here is clearly about preserving racial tagline.
7. Genesis 6:1-4 (Nephilim)
The sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose... The Nephilim were on the earth in those days.
Genetic Experimentation?: While not explicitly Yahweh, this passage suggests early interaction between divine beings and humans, producing the Nephilim. This can be interpreted as an intentional ancient form of genetic interruption.
Added:
Isaac's Marriage to Rebekah
In Genesis 24, Abraham, wanting to maintain the assumed purity of his lineage according to the deal with Yahweh, sends his servant to find a wife for his son, Isaac, from among his relatives. He specifically warns the servant to avoid the local Canaanites and instead go back to Abraham’s homeland, Nahor in Mesopotamia, to find a wife from his own kin. The servant finds Rebekah, the daughter of Bethuel and granddaughter of Nahor, Abraham’s brother, making sure that Isaac’s marriage preserves the presumed purity of the alleged chosen family line.
Jacob's Marriage to Rachel and Leah
In Genesis 28, following the same principles, Isaac tells his son Jacob to avoid marrying Canaanite women and instead travel to Paddan-Aram (Haran), the homeland of his mother Rebekah, to find a wife among her relatives. Jacob marries Rachel and Leah, the daughters of Laban, Rebekah’s brother. This marriage continues the pattern of deliberately choosing spouses from within a particular unit/ DNA bank/ family to preserve a lineage that Yahweh has tagged.
This being's selective breeding among his chosen people [ chosen for '?' ] plus the over emphasis on bloodlines, prohibitions against intermarriage, and policies after conquests strongly support the school of thought that postulates Yahweh's secret Xenophobic Genetic Experimentation Like Lab Animals on the 'Poor People' ๐ Hidden Within Religious Doctrine" .
Comments
Post a Comment