—The Actual wealthiest man in the world - When looking At Tangible Wealth - liquid cash, private businesses, real estate, and other tangible holdings rather than 4th Reich propaganda That will Precipitate Post-humanism
January 2023, Musk's value [ not actual wealth ] was $138 billion, following a massive loss in 2022 attributed to Tesla's stock performance and his acquisition of Twitter (now X).
Between January 2023 and late 2024, Musk's value [ not actual wealth ] was $170 billion, driven by rebounds in Tesla’s valuation, strong SpaceX performance, and the growth of his AI venture, xAI.
Despite fluctuations, including a notable $29.9 billion drop during the first half of 2024, his overall trajectory during this period was upward. As of November 2024, Musk's valued [ not actual wealth ] to be worth between $308 billion and $335 billion, according to only Forbes and Bloomberg.
However, no evidence suggests that International or Chinese sources have independently verified or recalculated his net worth differently from Western agencies for example Eastern/ Chinese business-focused outlets tend to reframe wealth in local or geopolitical contexts rather than presenting unique valuations.
.
When evaluating the wealth of the world’s richest individuals, a notable distinction emerges between their reported net worth—often derived from fluctuating stock valuations—and their actual tangible assets.
These include liquid cash, private businesses, real estate, and other stable holdings, which can offer a more enduring measure of financial power.
Here's closer look at how some of the wealthiest individuals rank when considering their tangible wealth:
1. Bernard Arnault & Family
Bernard Arnault, the chairman of LVMH, derives the majority of his wealth from his control of the luxury conglomerate. However, his tangible asset base extends well beyond the value of LVMH stock. His holdings include significant real estate assets, both in France and globally, alongside an extensive private art collection. These diversified and relatively stable physical assets position Arnault as a leading figure in terms of tangible wealth.
2. Jeff Bezos
Jeff Bezos’ wealth, though often tied to Amazon, also encompasses significant non-stock assets. These include his space exploration company, Blue Origin, valued at approximately $15 billion, as well as a broad real estate portfolio, including his Washington D.C. mansion and other properties. Bezos has also accumulated billions in liquid cash through the sale of Amazon shares over time, further strengthening his position in terms of tangible wealth.
3. Larry Ellison
Larry Ellison, the co-founder of Oracle, has amassed an impressive portfolio of tangible assets, including the ownership of the Hawaiian island of Lanai and numerous luxury properties. Ellison also holds investments in yachts and other high-value physical assets, which, together with his private investments, form a substantial proportion of his wealth. This places him among the most diversified in terms of physical holdings.
4. Elon Musk
While Elon Musk’s wealth is largely tied to his stakes in Tesla, SpaceX, and ventures like Neuralink and The Boring Company, his tangible assets are comparatively modest. Musk retains some real estate holdings, though he has divested from most of his properties, and his liquid cash holdings are relatively limited. His reliance on the value of his companies makes his wealth more susceptible to market fluctuations.
5. Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg’s wealth remains heavily concentrated in Meta (formerly Facebook) stock. While he does own notable real estate assets, including properties in California and Hawaii, his holdings in liquid or non-stock tangible assets are comparatively smaller. This reliance on equity markets differentiates him from peers with more diversified asset bases.
Conclusion
In terms of tangible, non-stock wealth, Bernard Arnault and Jeff Bezos remain leaders, owing to their diverse holdings in real estate, private enterprises, and liquid cash.
Their financial independence from volatile stock market valuations provides a more stable foundation for their wealth.
In contrast, individuals like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg are more reliant on the performance of their publicly traded companies, highlighting the sensitive differences in wealth composition among the world’s richest individuals.
Relative:
The “wealth before ''cred'' or substance” Narrative - Intelligence Agencies Crudely Touting Elon Musk In Our Faces Daily As The Worlds richest '?' Man Has A Reason - Here's Why [ Edward Bernays Old Chess Move in C21AD ].
Precipitate Post-humanism is a term that reflects an emergent philosophical stance within post-humanist discourse, emphasizing an accelerated or abrupt transition away from traditional human-centered paradigms. This concept situates itself within broader post-humanist ideas, which challenge anthropocentrism—the privileging of human perspectives and concerns—and often embrace the integration of technology, non-human agents, and ecological systems into frameworks for understanding existence and agency.
Key Aspects of Precipitate Post-humanism:
Acceleration of Change:
The "precipitate" aspect refers to a rapid or catalyzed shift away from established norms of human exceptionalism. This can include the intensification of technological integration (like artificial intelligence, bioengineering, or neural enhancements) and the corresponding redefinition of what it means to be "human."Interdependence with Technology:
This approach emphasizes the entanglement of humans with technology, proposing that the boundaries between the human, technological, and ecological domains are increasingly blurred. It critiques the notion of an autonomous, self-sufficient human subject.Philosophical and Ethical Implications:
Precipitate post-humanism examines the ethical consequences of this rapid transformation. How should society navigate the risks and benefits of enhanced AI, automation, and biotech? What rights should non-human entities, whether animals, ecosystems, or machines, hold?Potential Critiques:
Critics of such rapid shifts often highlight the dangers of uncritical adoption of post-human technologies, including exacerbation of social inequalities, loss of human identity, and unforeseen ecological impacts.
This term often appears in theoretical contexts, such as critical theory, speculative design, and post-anthropocentric philosophy, emphasizing a critical engagement with emerging conditions rather than simply celebrating technological progress.
Comments
Post a Comment