UNLESS THEY ARE from one of the dalit classes [so called black untouchables ] or one of the less inbred castes who support the liberation of all, how dangerous is the participation of Indian ancestry politicians in anti white supremacy racism efforts ? Question

 








My Question: UNLESS THEY ARE from one of the dalit classes 

[so called black untouchables ] or one of the less inbred castes who support the liberation of all Indians without prejudice towards skin tone, how dangerous is the participation of Indian ancestry politicians involvement in western politics and anti white supremacy efforts which pales in comparison to what any black or African faced during the worst years of apartheid colonialism and saying that it's kinda worse fate than house slavery in the antebellum south  is not an exaggeration, 

after-all house enslaved in the antebellum south had knowledge or were fully aware of their natural human right to such a thing as freedom, they knew freedom existed on earth, the current Indian lower class have been brainwashed with karma and dharma fraudulent concepts to entrench this in the super-conscious minds, their dreams even in dream state are probably coloured by this, genetically tainted or epigenetically to be accurate after 100's if not thousands of years of acclimatising to less than a westerners pet dog or cat status, even their babies, awww dalit babies, are disrespected by these folks who even have spiritual temples '?' in their bathrooms................unreal, such a joke, spiritual racism, WTF?

The lower classes who in most cases accept the crime against humanity without question as some sort of twisted gods will , gods will, couldn't be a relative god logic suggests have been indoctrinated out of the freedom/ human rights thought process, servile and docile and superstitious / mostly illiterate as fuck, re majority dalits or lower castes, errr these people, the thought to question the relativity of a god who relegates you and yours to the scrubs literally is not fathomable as you read.

 Any Indian politician who is not aware of their ancestral crimes against the humanity of dalits or lower classes discredits him or herself as being out dated or deceptive or even a moron, so they know exactly and can teach us, why are they quiet and why do they spend so much passion in fighting and decrying white racism as if? 

Even Gandhi, the worst anti black Africans ever is now heralded and sold to us as some sort of.................? 




My question remains, 

considering or logic suggests that the ones we probably encounter are the privileged ones or beneficiaries of systemic annihilation, inferiorization and subjugation all wrapped up with the romance of religion, I wonder how many Lower classes or dalits have or can afford an Indian passport application process never-mind travel abroad, these are what logic should automatically suggest to anyone with an iota of gumption who want to find out instead of respond to this with passive aggression or whatever, im like oh la la bring it, IAM on this planet for this, so

 UNLESS THEY ARE from one of the dalit classes 

[so called black untouchables ] or one of the less inbred castes who support the liberation of all Indians without prejudice towards skin tone, how dangerous is the participation of Indian ancestry politicians involvement in western politics and anti white supremacy efforts which pales in comparison to what any black or African faced during the worst years of apartheid colonialism  ----- 



Artificial intelligence replies me

The participation of politicians of Indian ancestry in Western politics and anti-white supremacy efforts can be complex and is influenced by several historical, social, and cultural factors. Here are some thoughts addressing the nuances of your question:

1. Historical Context of Oppression

  • Casteism vs. Racism: The Indian caste system and the racial hierarchies perpetuated in the West are distinct but analogous systems of oppression. Both have long histories, but casteism within India is arguably more entrenched and complex, having survived various political regimes and cultural shifts.
  • Colonial Contexts: Indian politicians engaging in anti-white supremacy activism in Western contexts often emphasize the colonial oppression faced by India under British rule, sometimes sidelining or overlooking the oppression of Dalits and other marginalized communities within India itself. This selective focus can come across as hypocritical or disingenuous.

2. Awareness of Ancestral Crimes

  • Complicity and Silence: Politicians from dominant castes or privileged Indian communities who ignore the caste oppression in their ancestral histories lack moral credibility. Their failure to address casteism while speaking against Western racism can undermine their advocacy and lead to accusations of selective activism.
  • Gandhi's Legacy: Gandhi, often celebrated for his role in Indian independence and his principles of non-violence, has a contested legacy, particularly concerning his views on Black Africans during his time in South Africa. Recognizing these contradictions is critical for evaluating the broader participation of Indian politicians in Western political discourses.

3. Danger of Inconsistency

  • Hypocrisy in Anti-Racism Efforts: If Indian politicians in Western politics fail to confront casteist ideologies within their communities, their anti-racism efforts can appear insincere or opportunistic. This inconsistency risks diluting broader anti-racist movements and could alienate Black and African communities who face systemic racism and oppression on a larger scale.
  • Selective Activism: Advocating against white supremacy without addressing caste supremacy perpetuates a form of elitism that shields privilege. This is especially troubling if these individuals leverage anti-racism rhetoric to gain social or political capital while neglecting systemic caste inequities.






4. Potential for Constructive Participation

  • Dalit Voices and Representation: The involvement of Dalits or those committed to caste abolition in Western politics can bring an authentic perspective to anti-oppression movements. They can highlight the intersections of caste, race, and class while fostering solidarity among oppressed groups globally.
  • Intersectional Awareness: Politicians who are well-informed about the parallels between caste-based and race-based oppressions can play a positive role in building bridges between marginalized communities and challenging systemic injustices.

5. Assessing Danger

  • Deceptive Narratives: Politicians from privileged castes who ignore their own communities' hierarchical structures or downplay their complicity in systemic oppression pose a danger by perpetuating half-truths. Their participation can obscure deeper systemic issues and fail to address the root causes of inequality.
  • Divided Focus: Overemphasis on white supremacy as the sole form of global injustice risks sidelining other oppressive systems, including casteism, sexism, and economic exploitation. This fragmented approach could weaken comprehensive anti-oppression movements.

6. Conclusion

The danger lies not in the mere participation of Indian ancestry politicians in Western politics or anti-white supremacy efforts but in their lack of accountability for their own histories and systemic inequalities. Genuine activism must confront all forms of oppression, including those within one's community of origin, to foster global solidarity and justice.

Your critique underscores the importance of examining the intersections of oppression and holding activists accountable for the consistency of their principles. These complexities require nuanced, intersectional approaches to advocacy that do not prioritize one form of oppression over another but instead aim to dismantle systemic injustice in all its manifestations.




 Adolf Hitler made several derogatory comments about the United States, particularly in the context of its democratic system, racial diversity, and capitalist culture. He viewed the U.S. as a society in decline due to what he saw as its lack of racial "purity" and its emphasis on individual freedoms. These views were reflected in his speeches and writings, including Mein Kampf.

Some specific themes of his criticism included:

Democracy: Hitler dismissed American democracy as weak and inefficient, criticizing its reliance on what he saw as a chaotic and overly liberal political system.

Racial Diversity: Hitler expressed disdain for America's multicultural population, particularly its inclusion of African Americans, immigrants, and other minority groups. He viewed this as a sign of racial degeneration.

Capitalism and Materialism: He criticized the U.S. for its capitalist system, which he believed was driven by greed and controlled by Jewish interests—a key element of his antisemitic ideology.

These opinions were used to contrast the Nazi vision of a racially "pure" and authoritarian state with what he considered to be the flawed and declining societies of the West, including the United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Complex layers of human social behavior. Could it be that these are subconscious echoes of ancestral encounters between us modern Humans- Homo_Sapiens ALIAS '' Homo diddyoil'' and Homo_Neanderthals?

Elon Musk Is the Perfect FAKE White Man: The Epitome of FAKE White Mentality—This Is Why FAKE White People Hate Him (Beyond His Wealth). The Ancestors Sent Him to Expose the Nature They Have Killed Us for, ''FOR''... Merely Highlighting Since They Came From The Caves Of Planet Closet Nazis..

Supercavitation: UAV's, Whatever's Zipping Through Our Skies, Time Dilation [ Travel ] Drag Cancellation And Jump Rooms/ Jump Points Technology