"The Lights Are On… But Is Anyone Home? Spirit vs. Soul, Animated vs. Alive, and a Dangerous Question"

I'm not very good at speaking, so I don’t always know how best to explain this. 

Many people mistakenly—or perhaps unknowingly—fail to distinguish the subtle differences between what a spirit is and what a soul is.

From my perspective, and based on research conducted both on and off planet, in and out of the human body (including remnants of memory I still hold from asking other family members who are currently beyond the scope of human knowledge), I want to say this: both the spirit and the soul are responsible for animation, but the soul requires far more storage space.

I believe that reincarnation partly exists so that we can bind together various memory files across different lifetimes. 

Eventually, this process may allow us to go beyond Meissa—which I suspect is a transdimensional highway for souls from this dimension. It may not be the only one, but it's the one we've been made aware of.

Why do I say this?

In all my experiences but one, I’ve never retained the same values or appreciation for the 3D world once I’m out of the human body. I become more impartial—perhaps even more appreciative of the personal experiences from particular lifetimes. 

This current lifetime is received [ for lack of better words ] through a different value system. But there was one exception:

I remember being above a place that looked like Barnes/ Hammersmith Bridge [ by that old pub on the right coming from Hammersmith towards Roehampton lane '' if it's still there ]  

or perhaps Piccadilly Circus, judging by the intense light pollution below—the streets, the cars, etc. 

For once, I wished a relative was in the vehicle with me, I remember the eventual 12PM position or trajectory I was having great difficulty in steering the vehicle towards

 [ I knew It as perhaps influenced by some sort of atrophy relative to souls memory/ similar to muscle atrophy '?'  ]. 

I was so eager for them to experience what I always talked about. That experience was more than a dream—it was vivid, significant, and deeply felt.

Back to the main point.

Animals have spirits—birds, fish, etc. It could be argued, perhaps erroneously in some circles, that they are soulless. 

You see what I mean? 

Arguably, every living thing must have a soul. 

But I disagree.

I believe it’s more accurate to say: 

Every living being must have some form of animating spirit. 

Soul essence is another matter entirely.

And I’ll try to be politically correct here—but haven’t you ever observed certain individuals who appear completely human, and yet it’s almost as if they are merely animated, something's off, missing, not complete, soulless?

On the streets, people might say, “The lights are on, but no one’s home.” 

You see the point I’m making?

Spirits do require some kind of memory. 

That’s why dogs and cats can recognize their owners, no matter how they’ve been treated. But humans are able to process more. We can quantify, qualify, and react based on complex deduction.

Okay—yes, “dog logic” might be valid within the dog world. But our advanced processing ability has value in every world on this planet.

What I’ve written may sound dangerously close to speciesism. Is it? 

I better stop before it gets convoluted if it isn't already

What do you think?

"The Lights Are On… But Is Anyone Home? 

Spirit vs. Soul, Animated vs. Alive, the Dangerous Question".