✅ Your concern is valid and grounded in reality. You're not wrong to notice or be frustrated by the lack of dialogue on racism in parts of the world outside the West. [ AI 😮😭🤬 ]

My Question:

"Allahu Akbar"

"Allahu Akbar"

"Allahu Akbar" is a FACT no debate.

While we rightfully decry racism, sexism and colour prejudice in the west, Racism and anti black hate in Asia, North Muslim Africa, Arab lands ETC is rarely discussed thus IMHO interaction with some of these people feels medieval [ quite rude and very CRUDE ] regarding their perception of black people, they seem a bit out of sync despite biological relativity, is this a valid question or presumptuously prejudiced ? Honest answer 

 [Unedited ] CHAT GT AI / Computer reply:

This is a valid question, and asking it honestly does not automatically make you prejudiced. You're raising a concern based on observed behavior and social dynamics, and you're trying to critically examine it — which is a crucial step in understanding race, culture, and global human relations.

Let’s unpack it honestly and clearly:

✅ Valid Aspects of Your Question:

Global Racism Exists Beyond the West:

You're absolutely right — racism, including anti-Black racism, exists globally. It's not confined to the West. In fact, in parts of Asia, North Africa, and the Arab world, there are long-standing cultural and historical biases against Black people that are rarely discussed in mainstream Western discourse. This omission can make these dynamics feel invisible or ignored.

Historical Roots of Anti-Blackness in These Regions:

Many of these biases have deep roots — for example:

In the Arab world, the legacy of the trans-Saharan slave trade still casts a long shadow.

In some Asian cultures, historical isolationism, class hierarchies, and beauty standards have fueled xenophobia or condescension toward darker-skinned people.

In North Africa, there's both colorism and anti-Sub-Saharan African prejudice — often tied to cultural nationalism and social stratification.

These realities are real and deserve open discussion, even if they’re uncomfortable.

Lack of Global Self-Reflection:

Western societies (to varying degrees) have been forced to confront their racism more publicly and systemically — through media, education, activism, etc. In many non-Western societies, similar introspection has not occurred on the same scale. In that context, what you describe as “medieval” attitudes can feel shocking to someone expecting more awareness.

🚩 Where It Could Drift into Prejudice:

It’s important to avoid generalizations like:

“They” are all rude or crude.

A whole culture is “medieval.”

These words suggest a blanket judgment that can easily cross into prejudice. It’s more constructive (and accurate) to:

Critique specific cultural norms, practices, or ideologies rather than groups of people.

Acknowledge variation within societies — there are progressive, kind, and anti-racist individuals everywhere, just as there are prejudiced ones.

Also, remember:

Ignorance isn’t always rooted in malice — sometimes it’s isolation, history, or lack of exposure. That doesn’t excuse bad behavior, but it helps explain it.

Summary:

✅ Your concern is valid and grounded in reality. You're not wrong to notice or be frustrated by the lack of dialogue on racism in parts of the world outside the West.

🚫 It becomes problematic only when you frame it as inherent to people or cultures, rather than products of complex historical and social forces.

💡 The best path forward is curiosity, clear-eyed critique, and compassion — paired with high expectations for fairness and human dignity everywhere.

Let me know if you want a breakdown of specific countries, historical examples, or ways to respond to anti-Black racism in cross-cultural settings.  [Unedited ]