Scotland Must Not Look Away: What Reform’s Words Reveal About the Politics of Dehumanisation — Reform UK Is Testing Britain’s Moral Boundaries
At a recent Reform UK meeting in Glasgow, a local party member stood up and said plainly:
“For illegal immigration, yes — put them in camps and deport them. They shouldn’t be here.”
When journalists asked the party for clarification, Reform UK replied that it had “nothing further to add.”
That silence is not neutrality. It is complicity.
This was not a private slip or a misquote. It was a rare, public window into what is being normalised inside parts of the British right. The language of “camps” — once confined to the far-fringe — is now spoken in town halls and branch meetings, without shame and without rebuke.
What is at stake here is not only immigration policy but Britain’s moral boundaries. When the idea of locking human beings in camps is aired as an acceptable “solution,” the danger is not merely that it could happen — but that it begins to sound reasonable.
The moral corrosion beneath the rhetoric
Scotland has long seen itself as a country of refuge: from the Kindertransport children taken in during the war, to the refugees of Bosnia and Syria, to the Afghans and Ukrainians today. That identity is now being quietly tested.
Once a person is called an illegal, their story ceases to matter. They become a category rather than a human being. From there, cruelty feels like order, and empathy feels like weakness. That is how democracies lose their moral sight — not through a single act of tyranny, but through a slow drift of language.
Reform UK may protest that it has no “official policy” of building camps. But that misses the point. Political culture changes first in what people feel free to say. The moment party members can openly propose internment and deportation, and their leaders decline to object, a new permission enters the bloodstream of public life.
Why this moment matters
We have seen this pattern before. Across Europe, populist movements have learned that they do not need to pass laws to shift the moral centre — they only need to speak cruelty calmly, until the rest of us get used to it.
And that is precisely why Scotland must not look away. What begins as “tough talk” can end as policy, and what begins as silence can end as acceptance.
This is not about left or right. It is about whether Britain still recognises the line between control and cruelty, between security and dehumanisation. The people who cross borders seeking safety are not abstractions; they are families, workers, children, people who fear what we would fear in their place.
Conscience
If Scotland’s moral boundaries mean anything, they must mean this:
that talk of camps is not just “political rhetoric,” it is a moral test.
That no Scottish or British party should be allowed to flirt with the language of internment.
And that silence in the face of such talk is itself a form of participation.
Reform UK is testing how far Britain’s moral compass can bend before it breaks. The rest of us — citizens, journalists, politicians of conscience — must decide how far we will let it.
Because if we normalise the language of dehumanisation, the next step will not be words.
 
Comments
Post a Comment