The Psychology Behind Mocking African Parents: Internalised Hierarchies, Digital Performance, and the Contradictions of Modern Black Identity
In recent years, a wave of online content has emerged in which young Black creators—largely in the diaspora—produce comedic skits about “African parents.” These sketches typically hinge on caricatures: parents who cannot operate smartphones, who mix up passwords, who mispronounce words, who misunderstand Western norms, who discipline harshly, or who exhibit extreme frugality. On the surface, the content is framed as harmless humour. Yet beneath the meme culture lies a deeper psychological and sociological contradiction: the very children who publicly parody their parents as “backwards” often react with intense anger when racists deploy the same language or stereotypes against Africans.
This tension is not trivial. It speaks to issues of identity, internalised cultural hierarchies, diaspora insecurity, and the fragile public image of African-descended peoples in global media ecosystems. Understanding this phenomenon requires unpacking several overlapping dynamics.
1. Internalised Cultural Hierarchies and the “Civilisation Scale”
Modern societies, especially those influenced by colonial histories, still operate with implicit “civilisation scales.” European, Western or urban traits are unconsciously coded as modern; non-Western, rural, or immigrant traits are coded as outdated or unsophisticated. Young Black audiences, shaped by the same cultural environment, can absorb these hierarchies even when they reject racism outright.
Mocking African parents for being technologically slow or “out of touch” often emerges from this internalised scale. It becomes a socially acceptable domain where young creators can distance themselves from anything that signals “Africanness” as primitive. The problem is not humour itself; every culture jokes about generational differences. The issue is which specific traits are being framed as uniquely African, when in truth they are simply the universal behaviours of older or rural parents everywhere.
When the same young people later condemn external racism, they are not being dishonest—they genuinely reject racism. But their own content has unintentionally rehearsed the same stereotypes, creating a cognitive dissonance: what is acceptable to mock publicly becomes unacceptable when deployed by outsiders. This is the psychological contradiction at the heart of the phenomenon.
2. Digital Performance and the Incentives of Viral Culture
A second factor is the logic of online platforms. Humour that trades in exaggeration and stereotype is rewarded with engagement. Algorithms favour content that is immediately legible, familiar, and exaggerated. Thus, a subtle, realistic depiction of an African immigrant father will not go viral. A caricature of a shouting, confused, technologically incompetent parent will.
Young creators may begin with light-hearted intent, but platform incentives push them toward more extreme portrayals. Over time, an entire genre of “African parent” content emerges—one that no longer reflects the lived experience of most African households but instead mirrors the expectations of the audience.
The result is a kind of self-orientalisation, where a community produces exaggerated images of itself for entertainment, reinforcing stereotypes that outsiders then feel licensed to repeat.
3. Distinguishing Culture From Class and Geography
I make a point about “country parents” versus “normal parents” and this is very essential.
Many of the traits mocked in these videos—difficulty with technology, unfamiliarity with new social norms, heavy accents, rigid discipline styles—are not African traits. They are traits commonly found among older adults, rural populations, lower-income families, or first-generation immigrants anywhere in the world.
European, Asian, and Latin American rural parents display similar behaviours. Yet children of those groups rarely create viral content framing such traits as racially inherent. Instead, they contextualise them as generational or regional differences.
In contrast, Black diaspora creators often collapse generational, rural, immigrant, and African cultural markers into one broad category—“African parents.” This homogenisation is not only inaccurate; it plays directly into long-standing racist narratives that paint African cultures as uniformly “backwards.”
4. Public Image and Intragroup Responsibility
No community today exists in a cultural vacuum. When Black creators mock their parents publicly, they are not joking in closed family circles—they are broadcasting to global audiences who may lack context, nuance, or counterexamples. This is where concerns about public relations arise.
Communities with a stronger sense of collective responsibility—Jewish, East Asian, South Asian, Arab, and others—tend to avoid publicly humiliating their own elders in ways that reinforce hostile stereotypes. Their humour stays largely internal or at least framed with care. By contrast, some Black online humour inadvertently amplifies the very narratives that historically justified discrimination, exclusion, and violence.
This does not mean young Black people should never critique their upbringing; critique and humour have their place. But it does highlight a lack of strategic cultural self-protection.
5. The Hypocrisy Question: Why the Outrage Only When Racists Say It?
The outrage at racist insults is valid. But the underlying psychological mechanism is worth examining.
For many young diaspora Africans, mocking their parents is an internal bonding ritual—an inside joke that demonstrates shared experience. When outsiders repeat the same stereotypes, it no longer feels like bonding; it feels like attack, because the power context changes dramatically.
However, the emotional inconsistency highlights a deeper issue: if something is degrading when spoken by outsiders, why is it acceptable to publicly broadcast it ourselves? The answer lies in internal conflict: children want to distance themselves from immigrant traits to feel modern, but they also want to protect their parents from racism. This dual desire produces contradictory behaviour.
6. Reframing the Narrative: Toward a Healthier Cultural Psychology
The long-term solution is not censorship but reframing:
-
Distinguish between generational quirks and “African” traits.
Much of what is being mocked has nothing to do with Africa. -
Depict a wider range of African parenting styles.
Most African parents are not lost, confused, archaic figures. -
Recognise that public portrayals have public consequences.
Humour can be both cathartic and harmful, depending on execution. -
Rebuild cultural pride through balanced representation.
Modern African excellence exists in every field; it deserves equal digital space.
Conclusion
The mockery of African parents by some Black youth is not merely a comedic trend. It is a window into complicated identity negotiations, the pressures of assimilation, the algorithms of viral culture, and the legacy of global anti-African narratives. The contradiction—mocking one’s own parents while being enraged when outsiders do the same—reveals unresolved internal tensions rather than intentional hypocrisy.
Addressing this phenomenon requires a more mature cultural discourse: one that recognises the psychological roots of internalised hierarchy, the responsibilities of public representation, and the need to portray African life with complexity and dignity. Black children are not the enemy; the real task is to create healthier frameworks for expressing generational difference without reinforcing the very stereotypes that harm the community.
Comments
Post a Comment