The category commonly accepted globally as “white” is not merely problematic; it is foundationally fraudulent. The actors change—Hitler, Trump, ICE, Wagner Group—but the operating premise remains consistent.

 To be clear: this is an indictment of a collective fiction that continues to organise violence, policy, and identity long after science has rendered it obsolete. Anyone claiming biological membership in a “white race” should be prepared to demonstrate it scientifically.  

The category commonly accepted globally as “white” is not merely problematic; it is foundationally fraudulent. In the present era—defined by genomics, population genetics, epigenetics, and molecular anthropology—there exists no credible biological basis for “whiteness” as a human classification. 

It's not a species, not a subspecies, not a genotype, and not a scientifically coherent phenotype. Its continued use is therefore not an error of ignorance, but an act of political and psychological utility.

This matters. The category lives on and is replicated by every generation not because it reflects biological reality, but because it serves political, economic, and psychological interests. It's a constructed identity that functions as a shield—historically and contemporarily—under which state violence, exclusion, and hierarchy are justified. 

From European colonial expansion, to transatlantic slavery, to 20th-century fascism, to modern immigration regimes, the same logic recurs: protection of a fictional collective defined as “white.”

The actors change—Hitler, Trump, ICE, Wagner Group—but the operating premise remains consistent. The claim is always that a threatened “people” must be defended. Yet that people does not exist as a biological entity. It exists only as an ideological abstraction.

One might object by invoking “Black people” as a counterexample. However, this too misunderstands the argument. “Black” is not a natural category either; it is a reactive designation imposed within a racial hierarchy created by European colonial systems. It is not symmetrical with “white.” 

One is a tool of domination; the other is a label forced upon those subjected to that domination. To conflate the two is to ignore power, history, and origin.

Even outside terrestrial politics, the incoherence of “whiteness” becomes apparent. In military, aerospace, and intelligence disclosures—ranging from U.S. Army personnel to NASA contractors to international UFO researchers—non-human entities described as “white” are not described as pale-skinned humans. 

They are described as uniformly, unnaturally white—paper-white, luminous, non-melanated in a way entirely distinct from human pigmentation. Conversely, reports of dark-skinned non-human entities describe forms that are explicitly not African or human either. Religious and mythological texts—Hindu scriptures among them—similarly describe blue, white, and dark beings that bear no resemblance to European racial constructs. In short: when “white” actually exists as a biological descriptor, it does not refer to Europeans at all.

Slavery exposes the core absurdity and brutality of the construct. For approximately four centuries, millions of human beings were kidnapped, commodified, mutilated, raped, and murdered based on superficial phenotypic traits—principally skin pigmentation. This wasn't an accident of history; it was the practical application of a fabricated hierarchy. To invoke opposition to modern figures like Trump or historical figures like Hitler while continuing to self-identify with the racial category that made such systems possible is a contradiction that cannot be ignored.

The claim to “purity” seeded in racial ideology collapses under even basic scientific and economic scrutiny. Genetics demonstrates that human populations need diversity to maintain resilience. Economics teaches that over-concentration and repetition lead to diminishing returns. Closed systems degrade. 

It's not controversial;  it's simply A.B.C. foundational. Any ideology that fetishizes isolation, sameness, and exclusion ultimately produces biological fragility, social stagnation, and moral decay.

Racism, at its core, is not merely hatred—it's an obsession with exclusion and control. It's the attempt to regulate reproduction, belonging, and legitimacy based on arbitrary traits. Historically, such systems have been accompanied by widespread abuse, coercion, and dehumanisation. It is therefore neither extreme nor irrational to question the moral and psychological stability of an ideology that requires the denial of shared humanity to function.

To be clear: this is an indictment of a collective fiction that continues to organise violence, policy, and identity long after science has rendered it obsolete. Anyone claiming biological membership in a “white race” should be prepared to demonstrate it scientifically. No such evidence exists.

The conversation, therefore, hasn't begun. Any serious reckoning with fascism, state violence, or racial injustice must start by abandoning the very construct that made these phenomena possible. Until that happens, opposition remains cosmetic—symbolic resistance performed from within the same framework that produced the harm.

Reality does not negotiate with ideology. And biology does not recognise “white.”