25 unacceptable traits by ancient, civilised and modern standards of the dysfunctional Annunaki's.
.png)
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the gods descend like flies to feast, hinting at their insatiable human traits and desires. References to sacrifices in ancient texts imply a grim reality where blood is offered to appease the gods. Some translations suggest the flood/ climatic change warning came from Nibiru a while before, indicating prior knowledge.
Enlil's inability to stop the flood undermines his authority and power.
The Annunaki's actions suggest they may not have been responsible for the flood as claimed.
Enlil's involvement in the flood appears more like opportunism than divine retribution.
The Annunaki's self-serving actions paint them as antagonists rather than benevolent deities, their portrayal in ancient texts raises questions about their morality and ethics, a dysfunctional bunch who perhaps were a bunch of cosmic convicts on a cosmic prison craft who somehow escaped be it temporarily or permanently.
25 unacceptable traits
by ancient, civilised and modern standards
of the dysfunctional Annunaki's.
The Annunaki's disregard for consent and their involvement in non-consensual sexual encounters would be deemed utterly unacceptable by modern standards.
Their manipulation of human civilization for their own ends, disregarding the autonomy and development of humanity, would be condemned as unethical and exploitative.
The Annunaki's use of fear and violence to control and subjugate human populations would be considered tyrannical and oppressive in modern times.
Their involvement in acts of genocide or mass destruction, such as the flood, would be seen as atrocities deserving of condemnation and accountability.
The Annunaki's apparent disregard for environmental sustainability and the consequences of their actions on the planet would be deemed irresponsible and shortsighted.
Any involvement in forced labor or slavery, as hinted at in some interpretations of ancient texts, would be unequivocally condemned as a grave violation of human rights.
The Annunaki's manipulation of religious beliefs and practices for their own gain would be considered a gross abuse of power and a betrayal of trust.
Their apparent lack of empathy or compassion for human suffering would be seen as indicative of a deeply flawed and morally bankrupt worldview.
The Annunaki's propensity for deception and betrayal, as seen in their conflicting allegiances and broken promises, would be viewed as signs of untrustworthiness and moral corruption.
Any involvement in the exploitation or depletion of natural resources for their own enrichment would be condemned as selfish and shortsighted.
The Annunaki's apparent addiction to power and control, leading to conflicts and instability, would be seen as a threat to global peace and stability.
Their disregard for the sanctity of life, as evidenced by their involvement in acts of violence and warfare, would be deemed morally reprehensible.
The Annunaki's manipulation of genetic material, including alleged experimentation on humans, would be seen as a violation of bioethical principles and human dignity.
Their suppression of knowledge and information, as seen in their secrecy regarding the flood, would be condemned as a hindrance to human progress and enlightenment.
The Annunaki's elitism and sense of entitlement, as evidenced by their belief in their own superiority over humans, would be seen as unjust and discriminatory.
Any involvement in the spread of disease or biological warfare would be condemned as a heinous crime against humanity.
The Annunaki's disregard for democratic principles and individual freedoms would be seen as antithetical to modern values of equality and justice.
Their manipulation of economic systems for their own gain, leading to inequality and poverty, would be seen as exploitative and unjust.
The Annunaki's involvement in cultural appropriation and erasure, as seen in their co-opting of human myths and traditions, would be condemned as disrespectful and ethically wrong.
Their propensity for nepotism and favoritism, as evidenced by their familial ties and hierarchical structures, would be seen as unjust and discriminatory.
The Annunaki's involvement in eugenics or selective breeding programs, as hinted at in some interpretations, would be seen as a violation of human rights and dignity.
Their disregard for the rule of law and accountability, as evidenced by their impunity for their actions, would be seen as a threat to justice and democracy.
The Annunaki's involvement in acts of terrorism or political manipulation would be seen as a threat to global security and stability.
Their manipulation of historical narratives and records, as seen in their control over ancient texts and artifacts, would be seen as a distortion of truth and a hindrance to scholarship.
The Annunaki's apparent addiction to conflict and chaos, as evidenced by their involvement in wars and power struggles, would be seen as a threat to global peace and stability.
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment