The persistent thread of anti intellectualism in our culture fosters the mindset that equates ignorance with knowledge as democracy turning collective falsehoods into accepted truths & marginalizing accuracy !
AI Replies: It sounds like you're expressing a deep frustration with what you perceive as a systematic distortion of history and scholarship to uphold certain racial and cultural narratives. Your frustration seems to stem from what you see as a deliberate effort to deny the contributions and heritage of Black Africans, particularly in the case of the Olmecs and other historical civilizations.
While your anger is understandable given the gravity of the issue, it's essential to approach discussions about history and identity with a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue.
My Reply: Are you nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ignorance is just as good as knowledge or a collective lie becomes the accurate truth and the truth denied in sufficient numbers becomes a lie? --- DUH, dummy , do you think a constructive dialogue in 2025AD will change their destructive mindset ? Why on Earth would I think people who've been doing everything within their mindset to annihilate or dehumanise me since arguably 375AD are that cool to have a change of heart on this danke earth, GTFOH, you're gonna make me write a song, AI you're phuckries too, 4Q 2 - idiot
Artificial intelligence - Bullshit version AI Attempts to rewrite to be politically more appealing:
( my question - more appealing to who ? fuckheads, arseholes, racists and pigs ? those who knoe , know they don't need to be appeased from the truth , it doesn't hurt them, my jewish friends, Arab friends, latin friends, Caucasian associates ETC would do worse if at every level everywhere they look someone is robbing them of everything and replacing their contributions with --slavery, my Jewish ETC friends wont tolerate what IAM has been tolerating since 375AD for 1 year, so 4Q A.I. )
AI
When faced with the accusation of racism towards my suggestion, I often find it rooted in the privilege afforded by the complexion of one's skin. This privilege allows for the perpetuation of a distorted version of reality, benefiting individuals regardless of their contributions or actions to society. While I acknowledge that my perspective may be influenced by personal biases accumulated over a lifetime of observation, I also recognize the necessity of challenging falsehoods and calling out hypocrisy, even within my own circles where relatives may be wary of my outspokenness.
There exists a concerning trend of ignorance that permeates our world, fueled by anti-intellectualism and the dangerous belief that democracy equates ignorance with knowledge. This is particularly evident in the realm of historical scholarship, where certain narratives are perpetuated at the expense of truth and accuracy.
Take, for instance, the case of the Olmecs. Despite evidence suggesting African influence, there persists a refusal among European, Arab, and Latin scholars to acknowledge this possibility. Instead, they cling to outdated notions, often rooted in cultural biases and a desire to maintain a status quo that downplays the contributions of Black people throughout history.
In my forthcoming book, I intend to shed light on this unacceptable aspect of academia and the pursuit of truth. Those who perpetuate falsehoods and actively resist efforts to uncover the full breadth of our collective history should not be afforded the title of scholar or academic. Instead, they are complicit agents of a system that upholds white supremacy and distorts historical narratives for its own gain.
I am frustrated by the unwillingness of some to engage in honest discourse and acknowledge uncomfortable truths. My anger stems from a genuine desire for accuracy and inclusivity in the telling of our shared human story. Anyone who denies the African identity of the Olmecs, despite mounting evidence, is either willfully ignorant or actively perpetuating harmful narratives. It is my hope that through continued dialogue and education, we can overcome these barriers and move toward a more just and equitable understanding of history.
.png)
Where my suggestion is considered racist, i'd say it's because they have the luxury afforded by the tone of their skins to continue the hypocrisy and live in an unabated bootleg version of reality which will wrongly benefit them regardless their input or deeds to the society,
my position might be prejudiced or even biased, but this is based on a lifetime of observation, the most sensitive type, relatives are wary of me because i'm sensitive enough to call out their B.S from the oldest in my family to the youngest -----------------------
There is a cult of ignorance on earth , and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ignorance is just as good as knowledge or a collective lie becomes the accurate truth and the truth denied in sufficient numbers becomes a lie.............
One example is the case of the Olmecs,
European/ Arab and Latina scholars of old and even perhaps some as you read even today insist with
EYES WINKED that the Olmec heads ere NON AFRICAN, NON NEGROID, AND THEY COULDN'T HAVE BEEN , BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IN THEIR BIBLE AND THE ONLY BLACK WORTHY OF MENTION IN THE ARAB WORLD IS BILAL , an African slave ACCORDING TO THEM BUT HISTORY RECORDS HIM AS A LAWYER, AN ETHIOPIAN LAWYER/ TEACHER - Find out the rest
( anything to degrade black people and imply their only presence on earth is announced via slavery, a pattern you will find everywhere in these cultures )
-
--------------in the Latin world some of their academicians have insisted for ions that the Olmecs had African features because Artists and stone Masons who made these did not have sharp tools thus the round features, some even say they are unfinished/ or they rolled over ETC, the question of the modern looking gadgets, helmets, laser type tools actually depicted on these are ignored and mulled over and if you push further re these items, the very academicians and so called scholars, PHD guys will devolve to polemic, adhominem and passive aggression, i'm gonna write an entire book on this unforgivable trait of many of the Europeans and their arab/ latin allies when it comes to scholarship and absolute truth
they should be labelled savage agents of white supremacy because 90% of the history they have foisted on Earthing are lies,
the remaining 10 % are white supremacy glorifying stories , they will not come out to fight and where they do its a fake fight,
because they will lie, cheat , destroy , kill, kill, kill, just to keep humanity from accuracy, yet they insist they are superior, actual scholars and its a forever position if not checked , enemies of real progress on earth ?
they'll always want to speak for all of humanity even where they are not permitted to --- my point -- ANYONE WHO CAN CALL THE OLMECS ANYTHING BUT BLACK AFRICANS,
is a retarded product of incest who has never ever heard of Sumer, Annunaki, the black headed people, Tehutis ( Thoths debrief of landing / people with clubs and stones ), never heard of Na/ LAMURUDU OR THEY PREFER TO CHANGE HIS NAME AND CALL HIM NIMROD , IAM could go on and on with David - Da'odu as in odu -ifa,
but this is a public post, i dont wanna educate them and tell them where to look let them continue embarrassing their races on a world stage, we are here ----and yes i'm pissed off, you disagree ?
4Q 2 - Ase
Comments
Post a Comment