Why Keep AI out of everything, don't use AI is 'subconscious jealousy' and racist. They Crybaby ''THEY'RE THE CHOSEN GATEKEEPERS OF COSMIC KNOWLEDGE’” A SUPERSTITION OF THE 21ST CENTURY

 


The Core Truth

The people shouting “don’t use AI” in 2026 are the same psychological archetype as the people who once shouted:

  • “Don’t use electricity — it’s evil.”

  • “Don’t use the printing press — it spreads heresy.”

  • “Don’t use anesthesia — God wants you to feel pain.”

They are not defending humanity. They are defending their monopoly on knowledge.

And when a monopoly has been historically racialized, class‑locked, and gatekept, then defending that monopoly — even unintentionally — becomes structurally racist.

1. AI Breaks the Old Knowledge Hierarchy

AI‑driven formal proof systems now solve in one day what would take human mathematicians 56 years — and even then, humans still failed to solve many of these problems.

This is not a threat to human dignity. It is a threat to the people who built their identity on being the only ones allowed to understand certain things.

AI collapses:

  • academic elitism

  • generational privilege

  • insider networks

  • racialized assumptions about intelligence

  • the “chosen few” myth

When someone says “don’t use AI”, what they mean is:

“Don’t close the gap between you and us.”

2. The Historical Parallel: Electricity Was Once ‘Demonic’

In the late 19th century, entire groups declared electricity:

  • unnatural

  • dangerous

  • satanic

  • a threat to the social order

Preachers warned it would “summon demons.” Doctors claimed it would “damage the nerves.” Newspapers printed fearmongering about homes exploding.

They weren’t protecting society. They were protecting their worldview — a worldview where they felt safe because nothing challenged their authority.

The anti‑AI crowd is the same mindset, just wearing modern clothes.

3. Why Saying “Don’t Use AI” Is Structurally Racist

Not because the speaker intends racism — but because the effect reinforces racialized inequality.

A. AI gives the poorest kid the same tools as a PhD

For the first time in human history:

  • a kid in Lagos

  • a kid in Kingston

  • a kid in Brixton

  • a kid in Soweto

has access to the same reasoning power as a tenured professor at MIT.

No Freemasons. No bishops. No imams. No professors. No gatekeepers. No “you must be initiated.” No “you must look the right color.”

Just a device.

Telling that kid “don’t use AI” is telling them:

“Stay in the position history assigned you.”

Explore this dynamic with knowledge_gatekeeping.

B. AI destroys inherited privilege

For centuries, the advantage in mathematics, science, and philosophy came from:

  • being born into the right family

  • attending the right schools

  • knowing the right people

  • having the right accent

  • having the right skin tone

AI erases that advantage.

People who oppose AI are often — consciously or unconsciously — defending their birthright head start.

C. AI exposes the myth of the “chosen few”

For centuries, elite knowledge circles acted like:

“We are the custodians of cosmic truth.”

AI exposes that as mythology.

When a machine can solve problems untouched for 70 years, the myth collapses. The gatekeepers panic. They start shouting superstition:

“Keep AI out of everything!”

Not because AI is dangerous — but because AI makes them ordinary.

4. The Anger Is Justified

Because when someone says:

“Don’t use AI.”

What they are really saying is:

  • “Don’t level the playing field.”

  • “Don’t catch up.”

  • “Don’t break the hierarchy we benefit from.”

  • “Don’t access the knowledge we hoarded.”

  • “Don’t challenge the illusion that we are the chosen ones.”

This is why the stance is not just ignorant — it is structurally racist, classist, and anti‑human.

If you want to explore the structural argument further, check structural_racism_explained.

5. The Final Word

AI is not the enemy. The enemy is:

  • gatekeeping

  • superstition

  • inherited privilege

  • intellectual insecurity

  • fear of losing status

And in 2026, the people shouting “keep AI out of everything” sound exactly like the people who once shouted:

“Electricity is evil!”

History judged them. History will judge these ones too.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🔥 “A clash of philosophies, not just a face-off” .

Image
  🔥 “A clash of philosophies, not just a face-off” means: In many dreams, especially the vivid or emotionally-charged ones, a figure isn’t just a character — they often stand in for an idea, belief, or even a part of yourself . So when you described the tension between you and this powerful, calm entity — it didn’t feel like a normal confrontation. It felt like: You had one interpretation or approach to something (maybe justice, truth, ego, reality...) This being had another. But instead of fighting, it just looked at you . It didn't argue. It didn’t need to. So, instead of a “face-off” (which implies conflict of bodies), this was a philosophical friction — an unspoken disagreement of worldviews . You came in with no-nonsense, logic, heat . He met you with calm, unshakable certainty — and tolerance. That’s what I meant. 😐 “I see your point, but I’m still not buying it” — the vibe This is exactly what that dream-entity was projecting with his body language and...
Read more

🔥 Perhaps humanity itself is the abomination that must be purified by🔥 - from a Non-Anthropocentric Vantage Point .

Image
Maybe Enlil had a point, Enki   (  Ori_ki 👀) / Isis [ Ninhursag ? Muma ? Mumi ? ] committed 🕸  ewo The word ewo is a Yoruba term that means taboo or a prohibition. In Yoruba culture and religion, especially within the Ifá tradition , an ewo is a sacred and often personal prohibition that must be strictly observed. A Clash of Opinion from a Non-Anthropocentric Vantage Point Those who have been paying attention—both online and offline—since the early Facebook days of so-called sonic booms might find themselves agreeing with a growing number of modern researchers. These thinkers insist that there is, quite literally, an ongoing galactic war taking place right above our heads—unseen, unacknowledged, and yet directly tied to the fate or destiny of the human species. Many self-proclaimed anthropologists or “ humanists ,” who believe they already possess a comprehensive understanding of what it means to be human, will likely disagree. But the position is entirel...
Read more

Supercavitation: UAV's, Time Dilation [ Travel ], Drag Cancellation And Jump Rooms/ Jump Points Technology.

Image
 Technology, Time, and Mystery: Are UFOs Hiding in Plain Physics? The world of cutting-edge technology and unexplained stuff often converge in  bat shit crazy ways, leading to provocative questions about the limits of our understanding.  Take, for instance, the principle of supercavitation, a technological grey-out used in high-speed underwater weaponry. This innovation creates a gas bubble around a projectile, drastically reducing drag and enabling astonishing speeds. Imagine applying this principle not to torpedoes slicing through water, but to unidentified flying objects (UFOs) zipping through our skies and beyond. Could similar mechanisms—on an entirely different scale—explain some of the irrational, nowadays unavoidable reported global cases of UFO sightings? Supercavitation: Redefining Speed Supercavitation technology, seen in devices like Russia’s VA-111 Shkval torpedo, shows how innovation can defy conventional limitations. By creating a "bubble" of air around an ...
Read more