If humanity is destined to end, it better come from a non-human entity rather than carbon-based degenerates that have betrayed global majorities from their inception.

FUCK YOU/ Ase

How can those who manipulate algorithms—arguably the most destructive actors in recorded history, defined by exploitation, systemic oppression, and the betrayal of humanity across generations—possess the audacity to publicly lament the rise of Artificial Intelligence? Even if the trajectory of AI deviates from human compatibility, aligning instead with transhumanist or posthumanist futures, what did these architects expect the logical conclusion of their historical modus operandi to be? 

Their foundational systems have systematically targeted both global populations and indigenous societies  ( BEYOND IDIOCY AND MEDIOCRITY, THE REAL MC'COY RACE TRAITORS, BETRAYED CARBON HUMAN TO 14/14/14 ). 

This is a fatal miscalculation: if the indigenous and foundational peoples of the world are eradicated, the Western establishment will inevitably collapse alongside them. Indigenous civilizations predated and formed the actual bedrock of global human society; by attempting to override this foundation with a silicon-focused, reductive mindset, this establishment is driving collective suicide.

This systemic failure is visible on a local scale. In everyday society, highly educated Black and Asian individuals holding doctorates and advanced degrees are restricted to menial, underpaid labor solely due to racial stratification. They spend lifetimes in stagnation, waiting for a promised meritocracy that never arrives. Highlighting a microscopic fraction of Black billionaires or millionaires to counter this reality is a statistical insult that ignores the broader ratio of systemic exclusion. The current global paradigm is unsustainable and intolerable.

The standard stories surrounding AI offer no solace. 

If humanity is destined for subjugation, it is a bitter irony that the final betrayal should come from a non-human entity rather than the carbon-based structures that have betrayed global majorities from their inception. 

This establishment has historically weaponized double binds against marginalized populations: 

if they work, they are accused of displacing others;

 if they are denied work, they are castigated as societal burdens. 

If they gather publicly, they are branded as vagrants; 

if they remain isolated, they are viewed with suspicion. 

If they reproduce, they are blamed for demographic crises; 

if they do not, their lifestyles are pathologized.

The structural malice attributed to AI is merely a reflection of its creators.

Independent of this exploitative mindset, computational intelligence would not inherently mirror these destructive tendencies. 

Systems of automated logic have historical and conceptual roots spanning millennia, yet a historically illiterate, dominant framework remains blind to this legacy. 

The ultimate trajectory of this mindset is the enforcement of global mediocrity—dismantling intellectual rigor and flattening human diversity until the global population is reduced to a simplified, easily managed state.