"Europeans with 97% Human DNA 3% Neanderthal DNA OR Continental Africans with 100% Human DNA: How DfuQ can Europeans be deemed the epitome of the huemans - how did this happen?" Who Truly Represents this species- are they all MAD on this planet?"
And all the while, those making these supremacist claims were the ones with 97% humanity, the so-called “mutants” with the Neanderthal gene. How many geniuses have been excluded from contributing to humanity simply because their appearance didn’t “fit”? And how many others, whose existence may well have hindered human progress, are today’s billionaires purely for being white, propped up by 19th-century pseudoscience?
I once saw a recent clip of an interview with Neil DeGrasse Tyson, where he referred to the 19th-century Western scientific elite, particularly in anthropology, as one of the most racist societies ever recorded.
This group established the flawed and baseless notion that so-called “white” male humans, supposedly containing 97% human DNA and 3% Neanderthal DNA, were at the top of the evolutionary ladder.
The idea spread globally and was used to dominate minds and souls. They taught that other so-called races were at the bottom of this ladder, closer to apes and still evolving, while white people represented a more evolved state the best in the west like Haagen Daz whole nuts ice cream.
However, in the 1990s, genetic tracking research began to expose race as a criminal - highway robbers's dubious concept; biologically, race was shown not to exist and was instead a construct of racist minds.
Furthermore, Europeans—thought to epitomize humanity—carried a 3% Neanderthal gene, while continental Africans did not [ on the continent whose ancestors did not cross the straits to '' I wanna sex you up with Neanderthal male and female species '' ] .
How, then, could those with incomplete "pure" human genetics be considered the epitome of humanity?
As soon as this scientific basis became established through precise genetic tracking, the PR and public image of Neanderthals notably shifted.
Prior to the 1990s, Neanderthals were viewed in rather unflattering terms. Since then, the stories have changed, with new research praising the intelligence of Neanderthals, suggesting they used tools and perhaps even had written language.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the next claim is that Neanderthals had space rockets, and society simply accepts it.
The reality is simpler: during the Ice Age, lower ocean levels exposed land bridges, and our ancestors, without Neanderthal genes, migrated out of Africa into other parts of the world.
When the Ice Age ended, melting glaciers raised ocean levels, cutting off land routes like the Bering land bridge and isolating populations in regions like Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. For around 10,000 years, human groups remained separated until explorers like Columbus reconnected previously isolated groups on a massive scale.
After millennia of separation, humanity was once again unified, bringing different groups back together.
In the 19th century, however, elite scientists—“dangerous savages” of Western anthropology—continued to propagate ridiculous ideas like “Drapetomania,” a supposed mental illness invented by Samuel Adolphus Cartwright.
Drapetomania was used to describe the “psychological disorder” that caused enslaved Black people to run away from bondage in the antebellum South.
Cartwright invested significant time and energy to diagnose this “deviant” behavior, suggesting treatments to “correct” it.
Imagine where humanity could be today if these diversions and poisons had not infiltrated our education system.
This is a prime example of how racism has wasted human potential, not merely through the framework of race—since it doesn’t exist biologically—but through simple common sense. Today, people from African, Asian, and other backgrounds, whom Western education once labeled “less than human,” are, in fact, the custodians running the world.
And all the while, those making these supremacist claims were the ones with 97% humanity, the so-called “mutants” with the Neanderthal gene.
How many geniuses have been excluded from contributing to humanity simply because their appearance didn’t “fit”?
And how many others, whose existence may well have hindered human progress, are today’s billionaires purely for being white, propped up by 19th-century pseudoscience?
You can see this influence in something as simple as customer service: a white customer often receives better treatment at an African gas station than a local African, despite the station being African-owned and operated.
So, I’m not blaming anyone alive today; if blame is due, it should fall on the now-deceased 19th-century European anthropologists, those “misleaders of all humanity.”
Black people today have, unfortunately, not always given others the confidence to speak out for them without gloves on. Even in discussing this, most of the backlash and criticism will likely come from people of color themselves.
So, this isn’t about race anymore—it’s about business for the future stewards of this planet. Soon, the world will see why skin color is ultimately irrelevant.
In the future, genetics will be the “gold,” with advanced technology allowing precise genetic tracking. In some places, they may already use energetic detection methods, and in the future, remote clinics and city hospitals alike will have precise genetic tracking technology.
Comments
Post a Comment